Metrolink Pays $135K to silence Former Spokesperson.

Seen something really dumb on Metrolink? Here's your chance to share it with the world!

Metrolink Pays $135K to silence Former Spokesperson.

Postby rarkow » Thu May 07, 2009 5:12 am

Here is the actual settlement agreement between Denise Tyrrell and Metrolink.

Metrolink's Board went overboard to silence her and paid for it with our tax and fare money.

To read the agreement go to: http://www.metrolinkrider.com/tyrrell_settlement.pdf
(PDF file)

Click on the blue text (above) to download the dccument.

For details on this story, see this post: http://www.metrolinkrider.com/bboard2/v ... 230b1b7aed

Just how hard did Metrolink and its Board attempt to silence Tyrrell? Read this little gem from the settlement agreement.

(References to "the AUTHORITY", refer to Metrolink, i.e.the Southern California Regional Rail Authority)

The Paries agree that their professional and personal reputations are important and should not be impaired by either party. Therefore, DENISE A. TYRRLL, as an individual, and on behalf of herself, her heirs, executors, agents, attorneys and assignees, agrees not to disparage, discredit, defame or belittle, or induce others to disparage, discredit, defame or belittle the professional or personal reputation of the AUTHORITY, and each of its agents, employees, board members, administrators, successors-in-interest, offcers, directors, attorneys, insurers, assignees or member agencies, in any public forum whatsoever or to any third paries unless required either pursuant to a subpoena issued by a competent authority or an order issued by a court or trbunal of competent jurisdiction The AUTHORITY, and each of its agents, employees, board members, administrtors, successors-in-interest, officers, directors, attorneys,insurers, assignees or member agencies agree not to disparage, discredit, defame or belittle, or induce others to disparage, discredit, defame or belittle the professiona or personal reputation of DENISE A. TYRRLL in any public forum whatsoever or to any thrd paries, unless required either pursuant to a subpoena issued by a competent authority or an order issued by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction


Now isn't that a good use of our taxes and fare monies? Is it any wonder that Metrolink will be raising the fares, even though their fuel costs have dropped about 40% since the fare increase last year?

Comments anyone?

Bob A.
User avatar
rarkow
Administrator
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:14 am

Re: Metrolink Pays $135K to silence Former Spokesperson.

Postby Spokker » Fri May 08, 2009 10:41 pm

Why are you and I the only nuts on this forum? Why don't you get out there and encourage some other people to visit this site?
Spokker
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:49 am

I suspect that we will have more people here soon....

Postby rarkow » Mon May 11, 2009 5:22 am

I have been contacted by several reporters, including one from a national news magazine show. I suspect that we will have more posters soon.

Did you read that settlement agreement?

You thoughts?

Bob A
User avatar
rarkow
Administrator
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:14 am


Return to Stupid Metrolink Tricks Department

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron